Skip to main content
Advanced search
The Point - home
DonateSubscribe
HomeWhat's NewOpinionOff the ChartsExplainersFactcheckAbout Us
The Point — home
DonateSubscribe
The Point — home
Advanced search
  • Home
  • What's New
  • Opinion
  • Off the Charts
  • Explainers
  • Factcheck
  • About Us
DonateSubscribe
Subscribe
  • Home
  • What's New
  • Opinion
  • Off the Charts
  • Explainers
  • Factcheck
  • About Us
The Point - home
Privacy PolicySitemapComplaints & CorrectionsNewsletter

The Point recognises the ancestral connections and custodianship of Traditional Owners throughout Australia. We pay respect to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures and to Elders past and present.

©2025–2026 The Point, an initiative of The Australia Institute

WHAT'S NEW

NSW Government to bar coal and gas from buying carbon credits generated by the Great Koala National Park

Australia’s much-criticised carbon credit scheme has been dealt yet another blow, after the New South Wales Government announced its decision to bar coal and gas companies from buying offsets generated by the Great Koala National Park.

By staff writers

Wed 29 Jul 2026 11.43 AEST

Climate
NSW Government to bar coal and gas from buying carbon credits generated by the Great Koala National Park

Cartoon: Fiona Katauskas

Republish this article

This article is licensed under Creative Commons — Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0).

Republishing guidelines

  • You must credit the author(s) and The Point.
  • You must link back to the original article.
  • You may not edit or modify the article content.
  • Images may be subject to separate copyright and are not included in this licence.

Australia’s much-criticised carbon credit scheme has been dealt yet another blow, after the New South Wales Government announced its decision to bar coal and gas companies from buying offsets generated by the Great Koala National Park.

It comes less than a week after the Federal Government abandoned the flawed Climate Active program, which allowed corporates to make carbon-neutral claims for products and services if they met a set of government standards.

Polly Hemming, Director of The Australia Institute’s Climate & Energy Program, has previously described the reliance on carbon offsets as “state-sponsored greenwashing”.

Australia Institute co-CEO Richard Denniss described the NSW Government’s move as yet another blow for the fossil fuel industry.

“Premier Minns’ claim that coal and gas companies should be prevented from buying carbon offsets generated by his Great Koala National Park is a blow for the Albanese government’s failing ‘safeguard mechanism’ and its key client, the fossil fuel industry,” said Dr Denniss.

“Chris Minns is admitting what Federal Climate Change Minister Chris Bowen has been denying for years – that it makes no scientific sense to justify new gas and coal mines on the basis that some trees won’t be chopped down.

“The obvious first question is that if the NSW government won’t allow its carbon credits to be used for the sham of fossil fuel offsetting, why should anyone else be allowed to?”

Dr Denniss pointed out that that while the NSW Government’s decision is welcome, there is a lack of detail about their proposal.

“There is nothing in federal law that prevents any buyer of carbon credits from re-selling them to coal mines, gas frackers or any particular industry and without explaining how this will work, this is just a clumsy state intervention into federal climate policy,” he said.

“The foundation of the Commonwealth government’s ‘Safeguard Policy’ is that gas and coal projects can buy carbon offsets and such fossil fuel projects currently buy around two thirds of all the ACCUs sold in Australia.

“While it would make sense for the Albanese Government to prevent all fossil fuel companies from buying carbon offsets, it makes no sense for a state government to pretend it can control where any carbon credits it may generate will wind up.”

Advertisement

Related Articles

WHAT'S NEW

Troubled waters: Woodside’s Scott Reef plans spark fresh fears

By Tegan George

Woodside Energy is pushing ahead with plans for underwater surveys at Scott Reef, more than two years after Western Australia’s environmental watchdog raised serious concerns about irreversible damage from its proposed Browse gas development.

Climate
Troubled waters: Woodside’s Scott Reef plans spark fresh fears

OPINION

ASIC is finally opening Big Oil & Gas’ books. Here’s why that’s a very big deal

By Amanda Holly

For the first time, the corporate regulator is checking whether these companies are telling the truth about what it will cost to remove the wells, pipelines and platforms they have left scattered across Australia’s seafloor. It is the most significant intervention into the sector’s clean-up accounting this country has seen, and it could rewrite the balance sheets of some of our biggest fossil fuel companies.

Climate
ASIC is finally opening Big Oil & Gas’ books. Here’s why that’s a very big deal

OPINION

Browse keeps changing its story

By Alex Hillman

In the past year, the new Browse gas project at Scott Reef has been pitched as the answer to a West Australian gas shortfall and as backfill for the ageing North West Shelf. Yet more than 50 years after discovery, and after $2.5 billion in development costs, it still hasn’t reached a final investment decision or FID, as it’s called. That usually says something about a project’s viability.

Climate
Browse keeps changing its story

OPINION

You can’t fix what you won’t name: COP31 program omits the words 'fossil fuels'

By Louise Morris

Imagine a fire brigade holds a crisis summit about the damage caused by fire, and how to fight fire, and bans the word “fire” from the agenda... That’s where we are with COP31.

Climate
You can’t fix what you won’t name: COP31 program omits the words 'fossil fuels'