Skip to main content
Advanced search
The Point - home
DonateSubscribe
HomeWhat's NewOpinionOff the ChartsExplainersFactcheckAbout Us
The Point — home
DonateSubscribe
The Point — home
Advanced search
  • Home
  • What's New
  • Opinion
  • Off the Charts
  • Explainers
  • Factcheck
  • About Us
DonateSubscribe
Subscribe
  • Home
  • What's New
  • Opinion
  • Off the Charts
  • Explainers
  • Factcheck
  • About Us
The Point - home
Privacy PolicySitemapComplaints & CorrectionsNewsletter

The Point recognises the ancestral connections and custodianship of Traditional Owners throughout Australia. We pay respect to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures and to Elders past and present.

©2025–2026 The Point, an initiative of The Australia Institute

WHAT'S NEW

Government set to ban non-compete clauses for workers earning under $190,100

Australia is set to ban non-compete clauses for workers earning under $190,100, with the government eager to do away with what it describes as “massive productivity and wage killers”.

By Tegan George

Fri 11 Sep 2026 10.32 AEST

Economy
Government set to ban non-compete clauses for workers earning under $190,100

Photo: Assistant Minister for Productivity, Competition, Charities and Treasury, Andrew Leigh speaks to media. Photo: AAP Image/Mick Tsikas

Republish this article

This article is licensed under Creative Commons — Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0).

Republishing guidelines

  • You must credit the author(s) and The Point.
  • You must link back to the original article.
  • You may not edit or modify the article content.
  • Images may be subject to separate copyright and are not included in this licence.

Australia is set to ban non-compete clauses for workers earning under $190,100, with the government eager to do away with what it describes as “massive productivity and wage killers”.

Once largely restricted to high-income earners, non-compete clauses now cover more than three million Australian workers, including those in childcare, construction, administration and hairdressing.

“Job switching is so fundamental and important to the economy and workers themselves,” said Assistant Minister for Productivity Dr Andrew Leigh.

“You can frame it as egalitarianism, you can frame it as freedom, or you can just frame it as the Aussie fair go.”

One in five Australian workers are now constrained by a non-compete clause – which may be unenforceable.

Speaking on the Australia Institute’s podcast Follow The Money, Dr Leigh said workers shouldn’t have to pay a lawyer to find out.

“Who’s got $100,000 to hire a lawyer and challenge it?” he asked.

He said workers were also unlikely to question a non-compete clause when starting a new job for fear of appearing disloyal.

“It’s a bit like when you’re sitting down to plan a wedding, if one partner says, ‘Well, let’s talk about what the terms of our divorce will be like.’ No one wants to go into that space,” he said.

“Even a non-enforceable non-compete can be useful because it has that chilling effect, effectively holds onto your workers by making it harder for them to switch to a competitor.”

The Australia Institute’s Deputy Director Ebony Bennett described them as “a nasty secret buried in the fine print” that restrict a growing number of Australians from competing against their employer once they leave.

They’re also hurting productivity, with the decline in job switching contributing to Australia’s productivity slowdown over the last decade.

“What happens is you don’t get the dynamism, you don’t get the job switching, which is actually really fundamental to a successful company,” said the assistant minister.

With sluggish wage growth, changing jobs can pay off, while also allowing workers to move into roles that better use their skills.

“Our biggest pay rises come not from sticking with the same employer, but from moving to another employer,” he said.

Get our newsletter

Quality research, analysis, explainers and factchecks from experts you can trust.

Economic research institute e61 estimates abolishing the clauses could lift the wages of affected workers by up to four per cent, or about $2,500 a year for a typical worker.

Australia is part of a broader international move to ban or significantly restrict non-compete clauses.

There are outright bans in Colombia and Mexico, while Austria and Belgium have taken a similar approach to Australia.

France, Germany and Italy require employers to compensate workers during some or all of the restricted period.

Laws vary by state in the US, but in California, non-compete clauses have generally been banned since 1872, which Dr Leigh argued challenged the idea that they were necessary to drive innovation.

“Some of the most innovative places on the planet have had more than a century-long ban on non-compete clauses,” said Dr Leigh, referring to Silicon Valley – a global hub for Big Tech.

“It is that total hub of innovation, one of the biggest economies in the world if it was a country, clearly hasn’t held them back at all,” said Ms Bennett.

“But we do have the wage fixing story,” Dr Leigh added.

Companies such as Adobe, Apple, Google and Pixar were accused of conspiring not to recruit each other’s employees to suppress competition and keep wages low.

It ended with an AU$610 million settlement.

Dr Leigh said the new laws would also close a loophole that meant Australia’s competition watchdog would have been unable to act had similar conduct occurred here.

“When employers have too much power, then they’re more likely to be able to get away with non-competes and potentially could engage in these sort of wage fixing cartels,” he said.

“Right now, Coles and Woollies are breaking the law if they get together to keep prices high, but they’re not breaking the law if they get together to keep wages low.”

Submissions are open until 2 October 2026.

Related Articles

OPINION

Is the OECD’s Mathias Cormann right about productivity?

By Ray Wills & Peter Newman

Productivity matters, but economic reform should be judged by whether it lowers real costs, improves household affordability and delivers lasting benefits – not simply whether it lifts output. Climate resilience and a fair transition belong inside that assessment.

Economy
Is the OECD’s Mathias Cormann right about productivity?

OPINION

The cost of using AI is about to skyrocket, but do we have the appetite to pay?

By Thanh Hang Bui

We have been gorging ourselves at an all-you-can-eat buffet, but the menu is about to change. AI tools that have been discounted will soon start charging based on your usage, raising serious questions about our appetite to pay.

EconomyArtificial Intelligence
The cost of using AI is about to skyrocket, but do we have the appetite to pay?

WHAT'S NEW

'Imagine siding with the tech bros': David Pocock calls for 5% levy on AI data centres

By Tegan George

Independent senator David Pocock has proposed a five per cent levy on data centres that he says would raise $500 million by the end of 2030.

EconomyArtificial Intelligence
'Imagine siding with the tech bros': David Pocock calls for 5% levy on AI data centres

OFF THE CHARTS

Most of us don’t have trusts, and those who do earn a lot more than the rest of us

By Greg Jericho

Discretionary trusts are the tool of those with high incomes to minimise paying tax, and you can understand why they are unhappy about that ending.

Economy
Most of us don’t have trusts, and those who do earn a lot more than the rest of us