Skip to main content
Advanced search
The Point - home
DonateSubscribe
HomeWhat's NewOpinionOff the ChartsExplainersFactcheckAbout Us
The Point — home
DonateSubscribe
The Point — home
Advanced search
  • Home
  • What's New
  • Opinion
  • Off the Charts
  • Explainers
  • Factcheck
  • About Us
DonateSubscribe
Subscribe
  • Home
  • What's New
  • Opinion
  • Off the Charts
  • Explainers
  • Factcheck
  • About Us
The Point - home
Privacy PolicySitemapComplaints & CorrectionsNewsletter

The Point recognises the ancestral connections and custodianship of Traditional Owners throughout Australia. We pay respect to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures and to Elders past and present.

©2025–2026 The Point, an initiative of The Australia Institute

OPINION

Raising the rate of JobSeeker would save lives

For decades, successive governments have kept unemployment payments in Australia below all accepted measures of adequacy - JobSeeker now sits at just 41% of the minimum wage, and Youth Allowance is even worse at 34%. The results of this are clear in recent official data on death rates and ACOSS' latest Raise the Rate survey.

Charmaine Crowe

Charmaine Crowe

Wed 30 Sep 2026 09.00 AEST

Society & InequalityHealth
Raising the rate of JobSeeker would save lives

Photo: AAP Image/Dean Lewins

For decades, successive governments have kept unemployment payments in Australia below all accepted measures of adequacy – JobSeeker now sits at just 41% of the minimum wage, and Youth Allowance is even worse at 34%.

The results of this are clear in recent official data on death rates and our latest Raise the Rate survey of people on income support.

Of the 1,560 people that responded to our survey, most of whom receive JobSeeker, about half can’t afford enough fresh vegetables, fruit and meat. Medicine and medical appointments are unaffordable for about three quarters of respondents.

Beyond food and medicine, inadequate income support left nine in 10 respondents socially isolated, with some describing themselves as not living, but merely existing. Others described the deep shame and stigma they felt of living in poverty.

People receiving income support in Australia are likely to eat poorly and lack medical care or social support because they do not have enough money.

Shocking new data from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) released this month shows that people are also more likely to die.

The mortality rate for people receiving working-age payments was more than nine times that of the broader population in the 11 years to 2022. Three in five people aged 22-64 who died between 2012 and 2022 received an income support payment such as the Disability Support Pension or JobSeeker.

For people receiving a working-age payment, ‘deaths of despair’ were well above that of others in the community. Accidental poisoning deaths, including overdose and alcohol poisoning, occurred at 22 times the rate in the broader population, while deaths from alcoholic liver disease occurred at 21 times the rate. People receiving income support had a suicide rate five times higher than the general population.

Only some of this disparity may be explained by the circumstances that lead people to rely on a payment. People with a terminal illness, for example, may qualify for the Disability Support Pension, and the highest mortality rate was found among people receiving this payment.

However, the death rate for people receiving unemployment payments was four times that of the broader population, with suicide, accidental poisoning and coronary heart disease the three leading causes of death. More than 36,000 people receiving unemployment payments died in the 11 years to 2022.

Furthermore, the mortality rate for people receiving unemployment payments has been steadily increasing since 2012, rising by 47%; a trend not seen among other populations.

What is going on here?

Between 2012 and 2022, the number of people receiving unemployment payments long-term doubled – from 300,000 to 600,000. In other words, a lot more people are having to live on a totally inadequate income support payment for a long time.

Get our newsletter

Quality research, analysis, explainers and factchecks from experts you can trust.

This increase is not simply due to population growth. Government decisions have contributed.

For example, in 2013, eligibility criteria for the Disability Support Pension were tightened, which led to more people ending up on the lower JobSeeker Payment. The government also increased the Age Pension age, seeing more older people end up on JobSeeker.

People receiving unemployment payments were also subjected to the harsh Targeted Compliance Framework. Introduced in 2018, it saw one million extra payment suspensions compared with the old scheme in the first year alone. In remote areas, tens of thousands of people receiving unemployment payments had them suspended or cut under the discriminatory Community Development Program.

These are policy choices made by successive governments that have real consequences for people on the lowest incomes in Australia. It is in this context that we should consider the AIHW mortality figures.

People without paid work in Australia are expected not only to survive on an inadequate income, but to navigate harsh compulsory requirements on which that income depends. Missing an appointment or a phone call can result in a payment being suspended or cut, exacerbating insecurity for people already struggling to cover rent, food and energy bills.

Is it any wonder that almost one in two people receiving unemployment payments report severe anxiety or depression?

Surely government must act to stop people who are experiencing poverty and distress from dying at such dramatically high rates.

In 2023, the Albanese Government increased JobSeeker by $20 a week in real terms. While welcome—because every dollar counts—the increase still left the payment well below the poverty line.

At the same time, we have seen governments give billions away in tax cuts that overwhelmingly benefit wealthy people. In 2026/27, the stage 3 tax cuts are estimated to cost $28 billion, $14bn of which will go to taxpayers in the top 20% of incomes – more than enough to lift JobSeeker and related payments to two thirds of the minimum wage.

In 2026, Australia still forces people who lose their jobs and need support to survive on an income that leaves them in poverty. Australia is wealthy enough to ensure that losing your job does not mean losing the means to be a part of the community.

The mortality figures for people receiving income support should be a line in the sand. The government must raise the rate of JobSeeker, Youth Allowance, Parenting Payment and related supports to ensure people do not struggle with severe financial stress. It must also stop the harsh compliance regime that demeans and harasses people into desperation. Otherwise, Australia will continue to see people without paid work condemned to poverty, and we fear these mortality figures will not change.

Charmaine Crowe is the Program Director, Social Security at the Australian Council of Social Service (ACOSS). Charmaine has 17 years’ experience in policy and advocacy at state and federal levels covering social security, aged care, health and housing policy.

Related Articles

OPINION

Adding life to our years, not years to our lives

By Luke Slawomirski

How long we live is only part of the story. What matters just as much is how long we remain healthy. And on that measure, we have a problem.

Society & InequalityHealth
Adding life to our years, not years to our lives

OPINION

All discrimination is wrong, unless you are a kid from a poor family

By Jane Caro AM

Discrimination is literally what private, fee-charging schools are about. They are transactional, designed to provide a private and positional good for the families who can pay their fees. Only public schools have any obligation to the public good – aka educating every child. The clue is in the name.

Society & Inequality
All discrimination is wrong, unless you are a kid from a poor family

OPINION

Victorian children who commit minor and low-level crimes don’t need ‘tough love’. They need connection and prevention

By David Jeffery

The Victorian Premier’s announcement of mandatory court-ordered rehabilitation for young people found guilty of low-level offences such as theft, vandalism, property damage and minor assaults isn’t entirely without merit. But the money could be better spent than on youth prison. Those of us working in youth and community services know that lasting reductions in crime come from prevention.

Society & Inequality
Victorian children who commit minor and low-level crimes don’t need ‘tough love’. They need connection and prevention

WHAT'S NEW

Australia in the minority of countries without official poverty measure as experts push for change

By Tegan George

Despite being one of the world’s wealthiest countries, Australia still lacks an official national poverty measure, making it hard to track whether efforts to reduce disadvantage are working.

Society & Inequality
Australia in the minority of countries without official poverty measure as experts push for change