Skip to main content
Advanced search
The Point - home
DonateSubscribe
HomeWhat's NewOpinionOff the ChartsExplainersFactcheckAbout Us
The Point — home
DonateSubscribe
The Point — home
Advanced search
  • Home
  • What's New
  • Opinion
  • Off the Charts
  • Explainers
  • Factcheck
  • About Us
DonateSubscribe
Subscribe
  • Home
  • What's New
  • Opinion
  • Off the Charts
  • Explainers
  • Factcheck
  • About Us
The Point - home
Privacy PolicySitemapComplaints & CorrectionsNewsletter

The Point recognises the ancestral connections and custodianship of Traditional Owners throughout Australia. We pay respect to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures and to Elders past and present.

©2025–2026 The Point, an initiative of The Australia Institute

EXPLAINER

Eight ways freedom of information law held governments to account in just the last two months

Every Australian has a right to access government information. Requests for access are increasingly delayed, but journalists and members of the public are still using freedom of information law to keep the government on its toes.

By Anara Watson

Tue 12 May 2026 14.38 AEST

Democracy & Accountability
Eight ways freedom of information law held governments to account in just the last two months

Photo: AAP Image/Lukas Coch

Republish this article

This article is licensed under Creative Commons — Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0).

Republishing guidelines

  • You must credit the author(s) and The Point.
  • You must link back to the original article.
  • You may not edit or modify the article content.
  • Images may be subject to separate copyright and are not included in this licence.

Every Australian has a right to access government information. Requests for access are increasingly delayed, but journalists and members of the public are still using freedom of information law to keep the government on its toes.

Here are eight things we learned thanks to state, territory and federal freedom of information laws, in just the last two months:

1. “The big four accounting firms Deloitte, EY, KPMG and PwC operate in a regulatory grey area with gaps in how the partnerships are policed, and the current oversight of audit quality is inadequate”, the Financial Review reports.

2. The University of Technology Sydney spent $1.5 million on an “executive leadership coach” while simultaneously proposing to axe courses and cut jobs to save money, as revealed in documents obtained under FOI by Four Corners. In 2025, 95% of more than 1,500 UTS staff passed a motion of no confidence in the vice-chancellor’s leadership.

3. Queensland’s Department of Primary Industries decided “not to probe the thirst deaths of more than 100 AACo cattle”. Governments may not be the only ones holding information back. According to the article: “Internal government documents indicate the first bureaucrats heard about the deaths was on Tuesday, March 4, 2025. That was the same day the ABC asked AACo about the January tragedies.”

4. Premier Peter Malinauskas had been warned by Adelaide Festival executive director Julian Hobba that cancelling Randa Abdel-Fatta’s appearance at Adelaide Writers’ Week could spark a boycott.

5. Public servants across several South Australian departments were told to remove “harmful” and “disaster” from algal bloom messaging, according to FOI documents obtained by the South Australian Liberal Party.

6. The Metropolitan Fire Service in South Australia is “underfunded”, “under-resourced”, and “not fit for purpose” according to a report released under the state’s FOI laws. “[Were] it not for the desire of the regional staff to make their communities safe … regional operations would be completely dysfunctional”.

7. FOI documents provided to the ABC “provided a snapshot of the Commonwealth’s process in vetting controversial Northern Territory Administrator David Connolly, completed months before a scandal erupted over his social media history.” In January, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese had commented that he was “worried about whether [Mr Connolly] is able to properly represent the Northern Territory in a way which is appropriate”, and yet the documents show that the federal government had deemed him “appropriately qualified” for the role.

8. Following an 18-month-long FOI battle, Rex Patrick had finally gained access to the report that saw Mike Pezzullo – former Secretary of Home Affairs – sacked for misconduct in public service. Across the four-part story, Patrick revealed Pezzullo’s conflicts of interest, confidentiality breaches, and love for gossip and critique.

These news stories show that FOI plays an important role in Australian democracy, but governments too often drag their feet on releasing information that the public is entitled to. The ABC reported this month that requests for documents from Victoria Police are now slower than at any point in its history, with those seeking access now facing a nine-month wait.

Freedom of information laws work. That may be one reason why governments do not seem to like them very much.

Advertisement

Related Articles

WHAT'S NEW

'Pathetic and wrong-headed': US midterms expose risks of Australia's Trump strategy

By Tegan George

The extraordinary results in the US midterm elections have exposed just how risky Australia’s approach to US relations has been and left the country on the outer, according to international relations expert Dr Emma Shortis.

Democracy & AccountabilityInternational Affairs
'Pathetic and wrong-headed': US midterms expose risks of Australia's Trump strategy

OPINION

Why the fifty-year history of Atlas Network’s ‘thinktank method’ in Aotearoa is the defining question of the 2026 New Zealand election

By Mohan Dutta, Ralph Wilson & Jeremy Walker

Correspondence, workshop agendas and grant reports in the records of the Atlas Network trace a direct line from Fisher's 1981 letters seeking businessmen interested in a New Zealand thinktank to the office of the Deputy Prime Minister, David Seymour.

Democracy & Accountability
Why the fifty-year history of Atlas Network’s ‘thinktank method’ in Aotearoa is the defining question of the 2026 New Zealand election

OPINION

The warning from the US election that Australia hasn’t received as clearly as it should

By Amy Remeikis

Australian governments have a history of being suckers to industry. We did it with fossil fuels and we have started doing it with AI companies. Now that the US has hit a stumbling block on approvals, Big Tech will start looking for the next good-enough sucker to keep their growth plans on track.

Democracy & Accountability
The warning from the US election that Australia hasn’t received as clearly as it should

OPINION

The US midterms should put Australian politicians on notice over the data centre boom

By Sarah Hanson-Young

Beyond Trump’s corruption, reckless war in the Middle East and the soaring cost of living, there’s another frustration bubbling beneath the surface, the unchecked expansion of AI data centres. As Politico in the US reported overnight, “the big winners” in the mid-terms were the candidates who campaigned against data centres.

Democracy & AccountabilityInternational Affairs
The US midterms should put Australian politicians on notice over the data centre boom