Skip to main content
Advanced search
The Point - home
DonateSubscribe
HomeWhat's NewOpinionOff the ChartsExplainersFactcheckAbout Us
The Point — home
DonateSubscribe
The Point — home
Advanced search
  • Home
  • What's New
  • Opinion
  • Off the Charts
  • Explainers
  • Factcheck
  • About Us
DonateSubscribe
Subscribe
  • Home
  • What's New
  • Opinion
  • Off the Charts
  • Explainers
  • Factcheck
  • About Us
The Point - home
Privacy PolicySitemapComplaints & CorrectionsNewsletter

The Point recognises the ancestral connections and custodianship of Traditional Owners throughout Australia. We pay respect to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures and to Elders past and present.

©2025–2026 The Point, an initiative of The Australia Institute

EXPLAINER

NSW inquiry finds evidence of modern slavery among temporary migrant workers

The NSW parliament has released the final report of its inquiry into the modern slavery risks that temporary migrant workers in the state are facing. Its findings make clear that there is modern slavery in Australia.

By Morgan Harrington

Tue 11 Aug 2026 01.00 AEST

Society & Inequality
NSW inquiry finds evidence of modern slavery among temporary migrant workers

Photo: AAP Photos/Lukas Coch

Republish this article

This article is licensed under Creative Commons — Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0).

Republishing guidelines

  • You must credit the author(s) and The Point.
  • You must link back to the original article.
  • You may not edit or modify the article content.
  • Images may be subject to separate copyright and are not included in this licence.

The NSW parliament has released the final report of its inquiry into the modern slavery risks that temporary migrant workers in the state are facing. Its findings make clear that there is modern slavery in Australia.

Blueberry farms in Coffs Harbour and the Nambucca Valley attracted particular focus. In a submission based on confidential evidence, the state’s Anti-Slavery Commissioner Dr James Cockayne said the actions of some labour hire firms in the region “exhibited significant indicators of modern slavery, including forced labour, debt bondage, deceptive recruiting, and possibly trafficking in persons, servitude and sexual servitude”. A recent episode of Four Corners included the first-hand account of a working “holidaymaker” who says they were subjected to modern slavery while picking blueberries in Coffs Harbour.

An estimated 30 per cent of Australia’s temporary migrants are in NSW. In addition to people on working holiday visas, the inquiry also focused on the approximately 6,000 people in NSW as part of the Pacific Australia Labour Mobility (PALM) scheme.

The PALM scheme allows people from nine Pacific Island nations and Timor-Leste to work in Australia for between nine months and four years. But they can only work in jobs classified as low, semi, or unskilled. Their visa is sponsored by a single “approved” employer, which means that their status in Australia depends on staying in the one job.

Under the PALM scheme, people from very different backgrounds come to work in Australia, predominantly on fruit and vegetable farms and abattoirs, for a single employer who often also supplies their accommodation. As the committee put it, this dependence on a single employer “creates clear ‘exploitable power differentials’ between employer and employee that disincentivise migrant workers from reporting abuse and exploitation.”

The inquiry’s very first recommendation is “that the NSW Government advocate to the Australian Government to amend relevant visa settings to allow PALM workers to more easily change employers.” Australia Institute polling shows that the majority of Australians would support such a change. Specifically, the poll found that:

  • Almost seven in ten (68%) Australians either support or strongly support PALM visa holders having the right to change employer without permission if they are paid less money than they are owed.
  • Nearly four in five Australians (78%) either support or strongly support PALM visa holders having the right to change employer if they are not provided with enough working hours to earn a reasonable income.
  • Four in five (81%) Australians either support or strongly support PALM visa holders having the right to change employer when there is a problem with the accommodation provided to them by their employer.

These are the kinds of problems PALM visa holders face, as documented in report after report after report. When this kind of thing happens, some people disengage from the program and walk away from their employer. The committee heard that the NSW Riverina alone is now home to approximately 1000 of these former PALM scheme workers, who live on the margins of society; they are especially vulnerable to exploitation.

The inquiry heard from community organisations that have called for an amnesty for disengaged former PALM visa holders, and the committee agreed. It has recommended “that the NSW Government advocate to the Australian Government to grant amnesty to all disengaged PALM workers and provide these workers with the option to either rejoin the PALM scheme or be voluntarily repatriated”.

The inquiry also heard how inadequate access to medical care is affecting the physical and mental health of temporary migrants. As it stands, PALM visa holders are not eligible for Medicare and are instead made to rely on private health insurance. Most are on basic policies, which means they often don’t have enough coverage for the care they need. This is a particular problem for women who fall pregnant while working in Australia. The inquiry even heard of cases in which people were too afraid to seek medical treatment because they feared that it might affect their visa, and recommended the NSW Government “advocating to the Australian Government to expand Medicare eligibility to temporary migrant workers, as a matter of priority.” The recent polling also shows that two in three Australians (66%) support or strongly support PALM visa holders having access to Medicare while they are working in Australia.

The phrase, “that the NSW Government advocate to the Australian Government…” is used in 13 of the inquiry’s 31 recommendations, which makes it clear that it is the Commonwealth Government that really has the responsibility, and the power, to ensure all workers are treated with respect and dignity. The PALM visa scheme and the Working Holiday Maker visa are national programs and, without change, the land of the fair go will continue to be a land in which temporary migrants are put at risk of becoming modern slaves.

Advertisement

Related Articles

WHAT'S NEW

Australians should be able to sue platforms over online harm: open letter

By Tegan George

Australians harmed by social media should be able to sue for compensation under the Albanese government’s proposed digital duty of care laws, according to more than 80 community organisations and prominent academics.

Society & Inequality
Australians should be able to sue platforms over online harm: open letter

OPINION

As our universities crumble, executives shrug off their own failures

By Sarah Kaine

You would think the months of public scrutiny on serious governance failures might give the leadership of NSW universities pause for thought. But apparently this is too much to ask of the 69 NSW university executives paid more than the state’s premier. 

Society & InequalityEducation
As our universities crumble, executives shrug off their own failures

WHAT'S NEW

Essential workers priced out of almost entire Australian rental market, new report finds

By Tegan George

Australians working full-time in essential services are being priced out of almost the entire rental market, with a new Anglicare Australia report revealing just how far housing costs have outstripped wages.

Society & Inequality
Essential workers priced out of almost entire Australian rental market, new report finds

OPINION

When essential workers can't afford to live in our communities, everyone pays the price

By Kasy Chambers

There was a time when having a decent job meant you could afford a decent home. You might not have been rich, but if you worked hard, you could pay the rent, cover the bills, and have something left over. For millions of Australians, that has fallen apart.

EconomySociety & Inequality
When essential workers can't afford to live in our communities, everyone pays the price