Skip to main content
Advanced search
The Point - home
DonateSubscribe
HomeWhat's NewOpinionOff the ChartsExplainersFactcheckAbout Us
The Point — home
DonateSubscribe
The Point — home
Advanced search
  • Home
  • What's New
  • Opinion
  • Off the Charts
  • Explainers
  • Factcheck
  • About Us
DonateSubscribe
Subscribe
  • Home
  • What's New
  • Opinion
  • Off the Charts
  • Explainers
  • Factcheck
  • About Us
The Point - home
Privacy PolicySitemapComplaints & CorrectionsNewsletter

The Point recognises the ancestral connections and custodianship of Traditional Owners throughout Australia. We pay respect to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures and to Elders past and present.

©2025–2026 The Point, an initiative of The Australia Institute

WHAT'S NEW

Government accused of "failing to meet the moment" on consultancy ethics after PwC scandal

The Albanese Government has been accused of being a “government of gestures” that has “failed to meet the moment” after responding to two parliamentary inquiries into the consultancy sector and its ethics.

By Tegan George

Wed 11 Feb 2026 00.05 AEDT

Democracy & Accountability
Government accused of "failing to meet the moment" on consultancy ethics after PwC scandal

Senator Barbara Pocock at Senate Estimates. Photo: AAP Image/Lukas Coch

Republish this article

This article is licensed under Creative Commons — Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0).

Republishing guidelines

  • You must credit the author(s) and The Point.
  • You must link back to the original article.
  • You may not edit or modify the article content.
  • Images may be subject to separate copyright and are not included in this licence.

The Albanese Government has been accused of being a “government of gestures” that has “failed to meet the moment” after responding to two parliamentary inquiries into the consultancy sector and its ethics.

The cross-party inquiries were triggered by revelations in 2023 that some senior partners at consultancy giant PwC were misusing confidential government information to drum up business and help multinational corporations avoid paying more tax.

The fallout saw more than 700 staff and dozens of partners leave the firm, including chief executive Tom Seymour, and PwC try to control the damage by spinning its government relations arm off into a new firm called Scyne.

“We discovered a tidal wave of malpractice, poor governance and structural failures,” said Senator Barbara Pocock, Australian Greens spokesperson for finance and public sector.

She explained how “so much of the Parliament’s time and resources have been spent uncovering unethical behaviour in the consultancy sector.”

Which is why the government’s long awaited response has received heavy criticism.

The Finance and Public Administration References Committee made 12 recommendations in its report tabled in June 2024.

It called for greater transparency around Commonwealth contracts with consultancies and advised the government to improve the training of procurement officials, develop a central register for conflicts-of-interest breaches for government entities and for all departments and agencies to publish biannual statements on consultancy contracts worth $2 million or more.

The Government agreed to only three of the 12 recommendations.

It “noted” a further 22 recommendations made later by the Greens.

The final report by the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services was tabled in November 2024.

In its submission, the Australia Institute argued governments should “better manage conflicts of interest by adopting guidelines on how to identify and resolve conflicts of interest, introducing a strict revolving door policy and banning political contributions from government contractors”.

The Commonwealth’s response to the final report was to “note” all 40 recommendations.

“The government’s response fobs off our report with baby steps that don’t meet the scale of this crisis,” argued Senator Pocock. “This is a government of gestures.

“Despite the extensive evidence and comprehensive recommendations, the government is once again choosing to tinker around the edges, instead of committing to actual reform.

The Australia Institute’s Democracy & Accountability Program Director Bill Browne said the result was “disappointing”.

He said the two inquiries had shown the parliament “at its best: Labor, Liberal and Greens senators working together to expose the shady business tactics and misleading claims of the consulting industry”.

“The recommendations from those inquiries were strong but proportionate and backed up by hundreds of pages of submissions and evidence,” he said.

In the wake of the PwC tax leaks, the Department of Finance banned the firm’s staff from working on government contracts while investigations are ongoing.

Research undertaken by the Australia Institute during the height of the scandal showed it was a popular move with polling research finding most Australians supported a long-term ban on the consulting firm after it breached public trust.

However, in August 2025, the consultancy giant was allowed to recommence engagement, with the Finance Department satisfied it had implemented policies to “to meet the ethical standards of governance, culture, and accountability”.

The decision was met with sharp criticism from the Greens, which pointed out investigations by the Tax Practitioners Board (TPB), Australian Federal Police (AFP) and National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) are still ongoing.

“The fact that the government let PwC back into the fold before … investigations had concluded is both baffling and pathetic,” said Senator Pocock.

“The government’s refusal to clean up the unethical practices rife across the consultancy sector is the reason why the Greens introduced a bill to parliament.”

She said under current legislation, the Commonwealth doesn’t have the power to ban a contractor for unethical conduct, and the bill will give Canberra “the teeth it currently lacks”.

“We must close the legal loopholes that allow government contractors who behave unethically to get away with it.”

Mr Browne added: “In the absence of Government action, both Greens and Liberal senators have introduced private members’ bills to keep the work of the inquiries alive. The Australian Senate, at least, can give these issues the attention they deserve.”

“The Australian Government is one of the biggest and most powerful clients any consulting firm would have,” pointed out the Australia Institute in its submission.

“That consulting firms are willing to breach the trust placed in them by the Australian Government, cut corners on its contracts and treat it as a cash cow is a worrying hint at how they must treat their smaller and less powerful clients.”

Advertisement

Related Articles

OPINION

The US midterms should put Australian politicians on notice over the data centre boom

By Sarah Hanson-Young

Beyond Trump’s corruption, reckless war in the Middle East and the soaring cost of living, there’s another frustration bubbling beneath the surface, the unchecked expansion of AI data centres. As Politico in the US reported overnight, “the big winners” in the mid-terms were the candidates who campaigned against data centres.

Democracy & AccountabilityInternational Affairs
The US midterms should put Australian politicians on notice over the data centre boom

OPINION

Reality: The Far Right's Kryptonite

By Alex Fein

Why billionaires keep losing elections they paid for.

International AffairsDemocracy & Accountability
Reality: The Far Right's Kryptonite

OPINION

Trump forced to face his political mortality – it’s time Australia did too

By Amy Remeikis

In Trump’s case, it’s personal irrelevancy. It’s not the end of MAGA, or the Trump legacy, or the end of the damage of the Trump presidency. But, no matter the next two years now, Trump’s acolytes will begin to plan a world beyond him. Will Australia?

Democracy & Accountability
Trump forced to face his political mortality – it’s time Australia did too

WHAT'S NEW

‘Reckless and cavalier’: Australia yet to publicly name where AUKUS nuclear waste will go

By Tegan George

Australia has agreed to take responsibility for highly radioactive nuclear waste from its AUKUS submarines without publicly naming where it will be disposed of, an arrangement inquiry lead commissioner Peter Garrett has labelled “astonishing, reckless and cavalier”.

International AffairsDemocracy & Accountability
‘Reckless and cavalier’: Australia yet to publicly name where AUKUS nuclear waste will go