Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s meeting with US President Donald Trump has been hailed a diplomatic success but critics argue it’s exposed Canberra’s quiet complicity as the US administration continues its march towards an increasingly authoritarian regime.
The Prime Minister emerged from the highly publicised meeting at the White House unscathed; a feat many now regard as the hallmark of a “successful” diplomatic engagement.
“It’s a pretty low bar,” said Deputy Director Ebony Bennett on a special crossover episode of the Australia Institute’s podcasts Follow the Money and After America.
“Meetings with Trump can go so incredibly badly,” agreed Dr Emma Shortis, Director of International & Security Affairs at the Australia Institute. “They can be volatile and unpredictable. They can be humiliating and none of that really happened and that’s hard to do.”
There was one awkward interaction that captured media attention when President Trump was asked about previous negative comments made by Kevin Rudd, Australia’s Ambassador to the US.
“I don’t like you either,” Mr Trump told Mr Rudd, “And I probably never will”.
“That could have gone off the rails really quickly and he made sure that it didn’t. Full credit to them in that sense,” said Dr Shortis.
“However, I would also say that that’s a fairly narrow way of measuring success. We tend to measure success in Australian diplomacy as something going very smoothly and nothing really changing.”
Mr Rudd sought out President Trump once the cameras stopped rolling to apologise for the remarks he made last year which included calling Mr Trump a “village idiot” and “incoherent”.
“Rudd was rightly identifying Trump as a threat to American democracy,” said Dr Shortis, “and in that stance, standing up for the shared values our relationship with the United States is supposedly based on.
“He was not inaccurate in that assessment,” agreed Ms Bennett.
“Australians should be proud that their ambassador was standing up for the principles of democracy and was concerned about the threat that Trump posed to American democracy,” said Dr Shortis.
Opposition Leader Sussan Ley immediately called for Kevin Rudd to be sacked, calling his position “untenable”, however, she has since backtracked on the remarks.
“This idea that we should be handing an ambassadorship over to someone who’s kind of closer to the MAGA movement … that just seems ridiculous to me,” said Ms Bennett.
Dr Shortis said the idea “falls into this trap of thinking, we have to cosy up to Trump no matter what, no matter he does, you have to put somebody in that position, an American fascist likes and gets along with.”
“It appears Rudd has done his job and done it very effectively in making sure that this meeting went smoothly, in doing the work around this critical minerals deal, in doing the work around AUKUS confirmation, as its being described.”