Skip to main content
Advanced search
The Point - home
DonateSubscribe
HomeWhat's NewOpinionOff the ChartsExplainersFactcheckAbout Us
The Point — home
DonateSubscribe
The Point — home
Advanced search
  • Home
  • What's New
  • Opinion
  • Off the Charts
  • Explainers
  • Factcheck
  • About Us
DonateSubscribe
Subscribe
  • Home
  • What's New
  • Opinion
  • Off the Charts
  • Explainers
  • Factcheck
  • About Us
The Point - home
Privacy PolicySitemapComplaints & CorrectionsNewsletter

The Point recognises the ancestral connections and custodianship of Traditional Owners throughout Australia. We pay respect to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures and to Elders past and present.

©2025–2026 The Point, an initiative of The Australia Institute

OFF THE CHARTS

South Australia’s election laws will give major parties and One Nation millions of taxpayer dollars – if they are even constitutional

The South Australian election earlier this year was the first test of the dramatic changes that the Malinauskas Labor Government made to democracy in the state. Under Labor’s electoral changes, to compensate for the ban on most private political donations, established political parties and sitting MPs receive generous taxpayer funding from South Australians (freeing those private donations to go to federal campaigns instead).

By Bill Browne

Tue 5 May 2026 01.00 AEST

Democracy & Accountability
South Australia’s election laws will give major parties and One Nation millions of taxpayer dollars – if they are even constitutional

Photo: AAP Image/Matt Turner

Republish this article

This article is licensed under Creative Commons — Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0).

Republishing guidelines

  • You must credit the author(s) and The Point.
  • You must link back to the original article.
  • You may not edit or modify the article content.
  • Images may be subject to separate copyright and are not included in this licence.

The South Australian election earlier this year was the first test of the dramatic changes that the Malinauskas Labor Government made to democracy in the state.

The declaration of the final electoral results this week confirms that One Nation’s spectacular rise will make the minor party a major beneficiary of the changes.

In total, One Nation will likely be entitled to over $6 million in public funding over the next term of parliament – most of which would not have been available under the old system.

Under Labor’s electoral changes, to compensate for the ban on most private political donations, established political parties and sitting MPs receive generous taxpayer funding from South Australians (freeing those private donations to go to federal campaigns instead).

Admin funding

A political party with 10 or more MPs receives $1.6 million per year to spend on party administration. One Nation is on track for seven seats (four in the lower house and three in the upper house), entitling them to $1.0 million per year – or $4.2 million over the four-year electoral cycle.

On 11 seats, the Liberals scrape through to the full $1.6 million entitlement – but a split in the party (as floated by Liberal senator Alex Antic) or a couple of defections would cost them money.

The Greens, with two MPs, will receive $490,000 per year, three times as much as upper house MP Sarah Game on $170,000. The four independent MPs are entitled to $40,000 a year each.

The taxpayer funding comes with few strings attached, nothing like the strict conditions placed on other publicly funded institutions like the ABC, art galleries or museums. The funding does give a sitting MP leverage over the party branch, since, by defecting, the MP can deprive the party of hundreds of thousands of dollars over an election cycle.

Campaign funding

The Labor Government also dramatically increased taxpayer support for the election campaigns of parties and candidates. This funding is calculated on a per-vote received basis, and is a combination of a post-election reimbursement and a pre-election advance funding entitlement.

One Nation will receive over $2 million in campaign funding for the next South Australian election.

One Nation spent just $3.3 million nationally in the 2024–25 federal election year. Come the next state election, they will be able to spend about that much in South Australia alone.

The Liberal Party will struggle, with about $2.3 million in campaign funding.

Normally, a party can turn to private funding to make up the difference – but South Australia’s new donation ban closes off that avenue.

Labor will receive the maximum entitlement of $4.0 million.

Victoria’s laws have been struck down, but South Australia’s have a similar loophole

In April 2026, the High Court of Australia struck down Victoria’s political finance laws because they included a “nominated entities” loophole that unfairly favoured the major parties. Contributions from nominated entities to major parties were unlimited, but everyone else was subject to the strict donation cap. The freedom of political communication protected by the Australian Constitution did not allow Victoria to impose strict donation laws if the major parties got a workaround.

South Australia’s laws also include a nominated entities loophole (although, unlike Victoria, the nominated entity money can only be spent on the party, not on campaigning). The nominated entities provisions were added at the last minute, after the very limited consultation process had concluded.

There was no inquiry into these undemocratic laws

South Australia’s new laws are generous towards sitting MPs and established parties, but miserly towards independent candidates and new entrants. A party that does badly at one election is starved of funds for the next, creating a vicious cycle. The money allocated for party administration bears no relationship to how much it actually costs to administer a party.

A parliamentary inquiry into the new donation ban and public funding laws could test them against the principles of fair political finance reform, and recommend reforms so the laws respect South Australians’ freedom of political communication.

Advertisement

Related Articles

OPINION

Going Digital: The People Formerly Known as the Audience

By Margaret Simons

This is an edited extract of 'Going Digital: The Transformation of the ABC' by Margaret Simons, published by Black Inc Books and available from the 3rd of November in all good bookshops.

Democracy & AccountabilityBooks
Going Digital: The People Formerly Known as the Audience

OPINION

‘Unable to get out of its own way’, Albanese’s Labor is looking in the wrong direction

By Amy Remeikis

Once upon a time, it was assumed that progressive voters, even if they were gritting their teeth, would fall behind Labor to block the Coalition and One Nation from winning power.

Democracy & Accountability
‘Unable to get out of its own way’, Albanese’s Labor is looking in the wrong direction

OPINION

Changes to Australian election laws have a major party skew

By Bill Browne

Recent and proposed changes to electoral laws at both the national and state levels risk perverse and unfair outcomes. Sometimes these are called “unintended consequences”, but that is too generous to politicians who are often fully aware of what they are doing.

Democracy & Accountability
Changes to Australian election laws have a major party skew

WHAT'S NEW

Minns Government to cap election poster sizes but stops short of six-sign limit

By Tegan George

The NSW Government has committed to restricting the size of election posters but stopped short of committing to a proposed six-sign limit within 100 metres of polling booths ahead of the March 2027 state election.

Democracy & Accountability
Minns Government to cap election poster sizes but stops short of six-sign limit