Skip to main content
Advanced search
The Point - home
DonateSubscribe
HomeWhat's NewOpinionOff the ChartsExplainersFactcheckAbout Us
The Point — home
DonateSubscribe
The Point — home
Advanced search
  • Home
  • What's New
  • Opinion
  • Off the Charts
  • Explainers
  • Factcheck
  • About Us
DonateSubscribe
Subscribe
  • Home
  • What's New
  • Opinion
  • Off the Charts
  • Explainers
  • Factcheck
  • About Us
The Point - home
Privacy PolicySitemapComplaints & CorrectionsNewsletter

The Point recognises the ancestral connections and custodianship of Traditional Owners throughout Australia. We pay respect to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures and to Elders past and present.

©2025–2026 The Point, an initiative of The Australia Institute

OFF THE CHARTS

The Federal Government spends more on shredders than FOI training

The Federal Government has spent $2.3 million on shredders over the last five years, almost double the $1.3 million spent on freedom of information training over the same period.  

By Skye Predavec

Tue 28 Oct 2025 09.51 AEDT

Democracy & Accountability
The Federal Government spends more on shredders than FOI training

Photo: Flickr/ajay_suresh

Republish this article

This article is licensed under Creative Commons — Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0).

Republishing guidelines

  • You must credit the author(s) and The Point.
  • You must link back to the original article.
  • You may not edit or modify the article content.
  • Images may be subject to separate copyright and are not included in this licence.

In the five years from 2020 to 2024, the Federal Government spent at least $2.3 million on shredders. That’s according to AusTender, the centralised database of Australian Government contracts. Among the 54 contracts were contracts for office machines with supplier Kobra Shredders Australia and shredders purchased from other companies. 

By contrast, government agencies reported spending just $1.3 million on FOI training in the financial years ending between 2020 and 2024. The FOI system has become much more expensive, rising from $64 million in 2020 to $86 million in 2024, but in 2024 just 0.5% of the total cost of the FOI system was for training.  

The imbalance between spending on shredders and the FOI training budget was spotted by Phil Dorling in the Sydney Morning Herald in 2012.  

There are some similarities between Labor Governments then and now. For one, Anthony Albanese is one constant, then the Minister for Infrastructure and Transport, and now the Prime Minister.  

But there are stark differences. Labor in 2012 made sweeping reforms to the FOI system that underscored the role of public servants as facilitating the open and transparent release of information. Today, however, the Labor Government seemingly wants to do the opposite, their proposed bill would make it harder and more expensive for Australians to get information from the government. 

One of the Albanese Government’s proposed changes to FOI would allow them to charge fees for non-personal freedom of information requests. This would create a potentially significant cost barrier for those making an FOI, but raise very little money. Assuming they were set at $50, fees would have raised $480,000 in 2024 – about what the government spent on shredders that year. 

There is wide agreement that the FOI system is broken – each FOI request now costs an average of $4,000 to process, compared to just $1,200 in 2007. It now takes over 50 hours for each FOI determined, up from 13 hours in 2007. 

But the problems aren’t caused by ‘artificial intelligence bots’ or ‘foreign spies’, as the Albanese Government has implied. Instead, they are caused by a culture of secrecy that pervades the Government. To change that culture, the Government could set an example by investing more in training public servants on how to proactively disclose information to reduce the need for FOI requests at all. 

If this Government truly wants to fix the FOI system, they could start by getting their own house in order.  

Related Articles

OPINION

Changes to Australian election laws have a major party skew

By Bill Browne

Recent and proposed changes to electoral laws at both the national and state levels risk perverse and unfair outcomes. Sometimes these are called “unintended consequences”, but that is too generous to politicians who are often fully aware of what they are doing.

Democracy & Accountability
Changes to Australian election laws have a major party skew

WHAT'S NEW

Minns Government to cap election poster sizes but stops short of six-sign limit

By Tegan George

The NSW Government has committed to restricting the size of election posters but stopped short of committing to a proposed six-sign limit within 100 metres of polling booths ahead of the March 2027 state election.

Democracy & Accountability
Minns Government to cap election poster sizes but stops short of six-sign limit

OPINION

‘Very, very stupid debate’: How we’re being played for mugs

By Amy Remeikis

It’s probably best for most people’s mental health that they are not forced to consider the hypocritical and ever-shifting grasping positions of Australian politics. For the most part, politics has the power to do good. Also for the most part, the way politics in Australia is played is very, very stupid.

Democracy & Accountability
‘Very, very stupid debate’: How we’re being played for mugs

WHAT'S NEW

‘Business as usual is not an option’: Phil Haines calls for kinder politics

By Tegan George

Phil Haines wants the alleged attack on his wife, independent MP Helen Haines, to mean something, urging Australia’s political leaders to turn tragedy into a catalyst for change.

Democracy & Accountability
‘Business as usual is not an option’: Phil Haines calls for kinder politics