Skip to main content
Advanced search
The Point - home
DonateSubscribe
HomeWhat's NewOpinionOff the ChartsExplainersFactcheckAbout Us
The Point — home
DonateSubscribe
The Point — home
Advanced search
  • Home
  • What's New
  • Opinion
  • Off the Charts
  • Explainers
  • Factcheck
  • About Us
DonateSubscribe
Subscribe
  • Home
  • What's New
  • Opinion
  • Off the Charts
  • Explainers
  • Factcheck
  • About Us
The Point - home
Privacy PolicySitemapComplaints & CorrectionsNewsletter

The Point recognises the ancestral connections and custodianship of Traditional Owners throughout Australia. We pay respect to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures and to Elders past and present.

©2025–2026 The Point, an initiative of The Australia Institute

OPINION

The forgotten reform that matters to every community

The Albanese Government asked charities what needed fixing. Three years later, one of the sector's most important reforms is still waiting to become law.

Saffron Zomer

Mon 29 Jun 2026 13.14 AEST

Democracy & Accountability
The forgotten reform that matters to every community

Photo: AAP Image/Lukas Coch

Every government needs ways to understand how its decisions are experienced in the real world. Ministers can read briefing notes. Departments can commission reports.

Pollsters can measure public opinion. But some of the most valuable information comes from organisations working directly with communities.

Charities see problems early. They understand how policies affect people’s daily lives. They translate lived experience into practical insights that governments can use. That role is easy to take for granted until it comes under pressure.

Over the past decade, charities have repeatedly found themselves defending their ability to speak up on behalf of the communities they serve. Restrictions on advocacy were proposed. Funding arrangements created uncertainty. Organisations were forced to spend time and resources defending activities that should be a normal part of a healthy democracy.

The consequence was not simply a dispute between governments and charities. When community organisations become less willing to speak openly, governments receive less information. Communities have fewer opportunities to be heard. Public debate becomes less connected to the realities people are experiencing.

That is why one of the most significant unfinished reforms from the Government’s Not-for-Profit Sector Development Blueprint matters far beyond the charity sector itself.

Three years ago, the Albanese Government committed to resetting its relationship with Australia’s not-for-profit sector. Through the Blueprint process, it asked charities what reforms were needed to strengthen the sector’s contribution to Australian public life.

The sector responded with a clear message: charities need greater certainty that they can advocate on behalf of the communities they serve.

The proposed model bill, Promoting Certainty, Trust, and Independence Bill, would clarify that advocacy is a legitimate charitable activity, strengthen the independence of the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission and help ensure funding arrangements cannot be used to discourage legitimate advocacy.

At its heart, the legislation is about protecting one of the ways communities participate in Australian democracy. Australia’s charity sector contributes around $200 billion to the economy each year, employs approximately 1.5 million people, and mobilises millions of volunteers across the country.

Beyond those numbers, charities play a distinctive civic role. They help communities organise around shared concerns, understand government decisions and communicate lived experience back to decision-makers. They provide a pathway through which people without privileged access to power can still be heard.

Governments make better decisions when they hear from a broad range of voices, particularly those working closest to emerging problems and community needs.

Yet halfway through 2026, the legislation has still not been introduced.

Anyone who has spent time around Parliament knows that support for a reform and delivery of a reform are not the same thing. Governments begin parliamentary terms with long lists of commitments. Over time, legislative schedules become crowded. Budgets demand attention. New challenges emerge. Political focus shifts.

But opportunities for reform do not remain open indefinitely.

Parliamentary terms move quickly. Legislative pathways narrow. Reforms that appear settled can find themselves deferred, not because anyone has rejected them, but because the window for action closes. If these commitments are to be delivered during this parliamentary term, legislation will need to be introduced and progressed before the end of the year.

This is the moment to fix the roof while the sun is shining. Otherwise, a reform agenda years in the making risks joining a long list of worthy proposals that attracted broad support but never reached the statute book. The Government asked the sector what reform looked like.

The sector answered. The legislation is ready. It’s time for the Albanese Government to protect charities’ voices.

Saffron Zomer is the CEO of the Australian Democracy Network

Advertisement

Related Articles

OPINION

AI has been a flimsy excuse for government laziness, underfunding and secrecy

By Bill Browne

A lot of attention has been paid to the mischief done by “agentic” large language models (LLMs) on their own initiative. But the more immediate and commonplace danger is that AI will multiply and indulge existing human weaknesses. AI does not have to be super intelligent to provide an excuse for secretive and poor-quality government decision-making.

Democracy & AccountabilityArtificial Intelligence
AI has been a flimsy excuse for government laziness, underfunding and secrecy

OPINION

A curious bird is the kiwi: reflections on NZ's election

By Allan Behm

A curious bird is the kiwi. Doomed to pedestrianism, it never gets to soar. And its voice is a natural coagulant. One’s blood freezes. Altogether unfortunate, it has turned its politics into a facsimile of itself. The New Zealand election last Saturday saw both the major political coalitions claim indecision as success, and confusion as deliberation. A curious bird is the kiwi. 

Democracy & Accountability
A curious bird is the kiwi: reflections on NZ's election

WHAT'S NEW

'Pathetic and wrong-headed': US midterms expose risks of Australia's Trump strategy

By Tegan George

The extraordinary results in the US midterm elections have exposed just how risky Australia’s approach to US relations has been and left the country on the outer, according to international relations expert Dr Emma Shortis.

Democracy & AccountabilityInternational Affairs
'Pathetic and wrong-headed': US midterms expose risks of Australia's Trump strategy

OPINION

Why the fifty-year history of Atlas Network’s ‘thinktank method’ in Aotearoa is the defining question of the 2026 New Zealand election

By Mohan Dutta, Ralph Wilson & Jeremy Walker

Correspondence, workshop agendas and grant reports in the records of the Atlas Network trace a direct line from Fisher's 1981 letters seeking businessmen interested in a New Zealand thinktank to the office of the Deputy Prime Minister, David Seymour.

Democracy & Accountability
Why the fifty-year history of Atlas Network’s ‘thinktank method’ in Aotearoa is the defining question of the 2026 New Zealand election