Skip to main content
Advanced search
The Point - home
DonateSubscribe
HomeWhat's NewOpinionOff the ChartsExplainersFactcheckAbout Us
The Point — home
DonateSubscribe
The Point — home
Advanced search
  • Home
  • What's New
  • Opinion
  • Off the Charts
  • Explainers
  • Factcheck
  • About Us
DonateSubscribe
Subscribe
  • Home
  • What's New
  • Opinion
  • Off the Charts
  • Explainers
  • Factcheck
  • About Us
The Point - home
Privacy PolicySitemapComplaints & CorrectionsNewsletter

The Point recognises the ancestral connections and custodianship of Traditional Owners throughout Australia. We pay respect to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures and to Elders past and present.

©2025–2026 The Point, an initiative of The Australia Institute

OPINION

‘I can’t work in the farce of climate change cruise tourism anymore’: why Antarctic guides quit their dream jobs

Our new study reveals how Antarctic tour guides grapple with the dilemma at the heart of their work — bringing more and more people to an ecologically vulnerable area, and helping cause some of the greatest CO₂ emissions of any form of tourism.

Zdenka Sokolickova, Christy Hehir & Elizabeth Cooper

Thu 30 Jul 2026 14.26 AEST

ClimateLifestyle & Culture
‘I can’t work in the farce of climate change cruise tourism anymore’: why Antarctic guides quit their dream jobs

Photo: AAP Image/Caroline Berdon

“You’d see massive glacier calvings, and you’d just want to cry. But all the guests would be cheering. And you’d be like … ‘can you not put two and two together?’”

Those are the words of a former Antarctic tour guide we interviewed. For anyone interested in nature, few jobs sound more enviable. You spend months among penguins, orcas and glaciers, helping visitors experience one of the world’s most extraordinary and unspoiled places.

But for some guides, like those we quote in this article, that privilege slowly became impossible to reconcile with their beliefs. Watching climate change unfold while helping thousands more visitors reach the continent eventually led them to leave the jobs they’d once dreamed of.

Antarctic tourism is growing fast, with over 120,000 visits in 2025-26 and up to 450,000 expected each summer within a decade. Our new study reveals how Antarctic tour guides grapple with the dilemma at the heart of their work — bringing more and more people to an ecologically vulnerable area, and helping cause some of the greatest CO₂ emissions of any form of tourism.

“I was down there on the hottest day ever recorded in 2020. Hiking up a glacier in my T-shirt, driving boats without gloves. It was really sad. The impacts of climate change absolutely hit you in the face.”

We interviewed 25 former Antarctic guides who decided to quit their jobs (all quotes are anonymised). These guides couldn’t align their morals with the effects of tourism they were witnessing day after day.

“Very often, for long periods of time, the penguins had maybe a few hours’ break during the night. Otherwise there were hundreds of people walking through the colonies non-stop.”

While tour operators often argue that visiting Antarctica can heighten tourists’ awareness of environmental issues, former guides were struck by guests’ ignorance of human impacts.

penguins with cruise ship in background
Penguins ahoy.
TC Photography / unsplash, CC BY-SA

None of the guides quit overnight. Their decisions emerged through years of reflection, uncertainty and moral conflict.

“We are always in conflict in our minds with two parts; the excitement to go to Antarctica to work in remote places we like, and being complicit in tourism industry development.”

“I can’t work in the farce of climate change cruise tourism anymore. It’s just, how can I go there, tell people about climate change and not do anything about it?”

The former Antarctic tour guides show meaningful change is often a painful and gradual process rather than a single dramatic moment. For many, years of acting against their values affected their wellbeing.

“I think what it comes down to for me is, you know, if I think about being on my deathbed and trying to look my kids in the eyes and saying, ‘I tried.’ I don’t know if I could have done that if I kept doing what I was doing.”

The stories of guides who left one of the world’s most extraordinary tourism jobs powerfully illustrate how abandoning unsustainable lifestyles can come with real personal costs.

“To this day, Antarctica … stays in the forefront of my head as the most incredibly raw environment that deserves all the care and protection. And I just think tourism and us being there was doing the opposite of that completely.”

Many of the research participants still felt deeply connected to Antarctica, and they sometimes regretted leaving. Mixed feelings and ambiguity are an inherent part of decisions we take out of concern and care for others, including remote environments.

“Do I wish I was getting on a flight and heading to the floe edge to take people out on the ice? Yes, there’s a big part of me that wishes I was doing that right now. And I also know that I would feel like shit after doing it.”

Loving and leaving

In the case of the people we interviewed, caring about Antarctica meant walking away from Antarctic tourism. The interviews suggest that distance doesn’t necessarily weaken responsibility. For these former tour guides, caring for Antarctica ultimately meant leaving it – and many felt better after they quit. Sometimes the best way to protect a place you love is to leave it alone.

“I was working very much against what I knew wasn’t right, and I think that was coming out in my body as well. And then when I made that decision to walk away, I just felt so much better. It was like I could breathe again.”

If you’ve ever questioned whether your work aligns with your values, these former Antarctic tour guides offer a thoughtful perspective on balancing career, wellbeing, and environmental responsibility. Their stories may also inspire a deeper appreciation for protecting Antarctica by leaving it untouched.The Conversation

Zdenka Sokolickova, Postdoctoral Researcher, Arctic Centre, University of Groningen; Christy Hehir, Senior Lecturer in Tourism and Events, University of Surrey, and Elizabeth Cooper, Postdoctoral Researcher, Arctic Centre, University of Groningen

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Advertisement

Related Articles

WHAT'S NEW

Young Australians’ human rights complaint prompts UN intervention over fossil fuel expansion

By Tegan George

Two United Nations human rights experts have formally challenged the Albanese government over its continued approval of coal and gas projects, raising serious allegations about Australia’s failure to protect young people from worsening climate change. 

Climate
Young Australians’ human rights complaint prompts UN intervention over fossil fuel expansion

OPINION

We took Australia’s failures to the UN. Now the government has some explaining to do

By Zhanāe Dodd & Maya Farmer

About a year and a half ago, nine young people from right across this continent filed a human rights complaint with the UN against the Australian government over its failure to protect our lives and futures from climate disasters. We call ourselves Generation Justice and, with our legal team from Environmental Justice Australia, we took this bold step because frankly, we’re over it.

Climate
We took Australia’s failures to the UN. Now the government has some explaining to do

OPINION

The Safeguard Mechanism is a key barrier to Australia’s fossil phaseout 

By Ketan Joshi

This is the first piece of seven in an ongoing series examining the remarkable flaws of the Safeguard Mechanism, updating our previous analyses with new data, facts and figures as a review of the scheme kicks into gear.

Climate
The Safeguard Mechanism is a key barrier to Australia’s fossil phaseout 

OPINION

Hidden documents show WA regulator told Woodside years ago that Browse would cause 'irreversible' harm. We are only finding out now

By Louise Morris

Documents obtained by Peter Milne in Boiling Cold and reported by The Guardian show, for the first time, what WA’s Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) really thinks of Woodside’s plan to drill for gas at Scott Reef. They are damning.

Climate
Hidden documents show WA regulator told Woodside years ago that Browse would cause 'irreversible' harm. We are only finding out now