Subscribe

EXPLAINER

What is the PBS and why does Trump hate it so much?

This is part of America’s long-standing grudge against Australia’s Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS).  

Thu 23 Oct 2025 14.00

International Affairs
What is the PBS and why does Trump hate it so much?

Photo: AAP Image/Lukas Coch

BlueskyFacebookLinkednxThread

Today, Reuters reported that Trump is eyeing a new investigation into price controls on drugs in America’s trading partners, including Australia. This is part of America’s long-standing grudge against Australia’s Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS).  

What is the PBS?

Established in 1948, the PBS is a scheme where the Federal Government subsidises most of the cost of the medicines it covers. But crucially, the Government also uses its bargaining power to negotiate lower prices for the medicines in the first place. Combined, this means that Australians have access to a wide range of medicines for far lower prices than what Americans pay in the US.

Initially the PBS covered 139 ‘life-saving and disease preventing medicines’ but has been expanded over the years to become a key component of Australia’s public healthcare. In all, it now subsidises over 900 different medicines sold under 5,380 brands, making them affordable for all Australians. 

Insulin, for example, crucial for managing diabetes, costs $31.60 in Australia and (in AUD) $115.16 in America, over three times more expensive 

Others medications fare even worse: Vyvanse, a common ADHD medication, costs $21.17 in Australia, but $411.30 in the US – 20 times higher. Atorvastatin, a treatment for heart disease, costs $24.81 in Australia but $2,628.39 in the US, over 100 times more expensive. 

Medicines are so much more expensive in the USA than in Australia that the best way to think of the comparison is to consider the US price as a multiple of the Australian price, as seen below.

So why does Trump hate the PBS?

As part of PBS, the Federal Government negotiates set prices for prescription medications with pharmaceutical companies. This effectively means that Australia buys its medicines at bulk, and at bulk prices. Combined with government subsidies, this means that Australians get their medicines on the cheap, but it also reduces the profits of the pharmaceutical giants which sell the drugs – including American ones. 

This has long been a sticking point for the US. Over 20 years ago, during negotiations for the Australia United States Free Trade Agreement (AUSFTA for short), the US pushed hard to water down the PBS. When this was highlighted by various groups, including the Australia Institute, the public backlash was so immense that the Howard Coalition Government was forced to resist US pressure

The AUSFTA still watered down the PBS, but far less than the US pharmaceutical industry wanted – and they haven’t forgotten. 

Earlier this year, in defiance of the AUSFTA, the Trump administration imposed tariffs on Australian steel and aluminium. And the US pharmaceutical industry is again lobbying the US Government to do something about the PBS. It seems their efforts have been successful, with the Trump administration preparing a new probe into drug pricing practices in America’s trading partners, which includes Australia’s PBS scheme. 

The threat is that, unless Australia agrees to dismantle or water down the PBS and make medicines more expensive, the Trump administration will impose retaliatory tariffs. 

What would that mean for Australia?

Healthcare costs are incredibly high in the United States, they spend significantly more as a proportion of their GDP than any other developed country (including Australia). But that spending doesn’t translate to better health outcomes – quite the opposite. The USA has a life expectancy of 78 years, five years shorter than Australia’s 83. 

The PBS is a crucial part of what sets Australia’s healthcare system apart from America’s. But, since it eats into the profit margins of big pharmaceutical companies, the Trump administration wants to gut it. 

If the price of maintaining our relationship with the US is paying exorbitant prices for medicine, then Australians will inevitably ask the question – is this a friend we really want?

Related Articles

WHAT'S NEW

“Maximum lethality”: the US military under the Trump administration

Australia’s allegiance to the US is being tested as the Trump administration faces accusations of illegal military action and escalating national security recklessness.

International Affairs
“Maximum lethality”: the US military under the Trump administration

OPINION

An AUSMIN pantomime in Washington

It does suggest that there’s something odd happening when the BBC’s fabled Goon Show provides the script for the AUSMIN talks just concluded in Washington.

International Affairs
An AUSMIN pantomime in Washington

WHAT'S NEW

Shorter America This Week: American National Security = White Supremacy, Trump’s Pennsylvania “pivot”, Venezuela 

It isn’t always easy to keep up with what’s happening in the US. 'Shorter America' is Dr Emma Shortis' weekly column looping you in on what’s going on in America with news and analysis that you can trust.

International Affairs
Shorter America This Week: American National Security = White Supremacy, Trump’s Pennsylvania “pivot”, Venezuela 

WHAT'S NEW

Australia and New Zealand 'offloading' care crisis to Pacific neighbours: report

New research from the Australia Institute’s Centre for Future Work has revealed that Australia’s poaching of skilled health workers from Pacific Island nations is leaving their health systems on the brink of collapse.

International Affairs
Australia and New Zealand 'offloading' care crisis to Pacific neighbours: report