Skip to main content
Advanced search
The Point - home
DonateSubscribe
HomeWhat's NewOpinionOff the ChartsExplainersFactcheckAbout Us
The Point — home
DonateSubscribe
The Point — home
Advanced search
  • Home
  • What's New
  • Opinion
  • Off the Charts
  • Explainers
  • Factcheck
  • About Us
DonateSubscribe
Subscribe
  • Home
  • What's New
  • Opinion
  • Off the Charts
  • Explainers
  • Factcheck
  • About Us
The Point - home
Privacy PolicySitemapComplaints & CorrectionsNewsletter

The Point recognises the ancestral connections and custodianship of Traditional Owners throughout Australia. We pay respect to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures and to Elders past and present.

©2025–2026 The Point, an initiative of The Australia Institute

EXPLAINER

How the Japanese Government taxes Australian gas

The Australian Government is getting less money from our gas exports than Japan is. How can this be?

By Rod Campbell

Fri 8 May 2026 16.15 AEST

Economy
How the Japanese Government taxes Australian gas

Photo: AAP Image/Jay Kogler

Republish this article

This article is licensed under Creative Commons — Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0).

Republishing guidelines

  • You must credit the author(s) and The Point.
  • You must link back to the original article.
  • You may not edit or modify the article content.
  • Images may be subject to separate copyright and are not included in this licence.

The Japanese Government raises $8 billion per year from its Petroleum and Coal Tax, including around $710 million from imports of Australian gas.

By contrast, the Australian Government is currently getting around $420 million per year from gas exporters paying Petroleum Resource Rent Tax (PRRT). Prior to 2023, it was receiving zero. Nada. Nothing.

In other words, the Australian Government is getting less money from our gas exports than Japan is.

State and territory governments also raise money from gas, especially Queensland which expects to get $1.2 billion this financial year (page 64) from its onshore deposits.

But most of Australia’s gas exports come from massive offshore deposits owned by the Federal Government. This means that even though far more federally owned gas is exported, Queensland’s government (like Japan’s!) raises more money.

How can this be?

The Australian Government is unusual because it effectively gives gas away for free. It does not charge a fee or a royalty to companies to extract the gas under the seabed around Australia that the government owns (there is one exception that we’ll come back to).

The state governments are different. They do charge royalties for the gas and other resources that companies dig out of the ground in their territories, such as iron ore, coal, gold, etc.

Instead of charging a royalty like the states, or an export/import tax like Japan, the Australian Government has its PRRT on offshore oil and gas.

PRRT works differently to a simple royalty or export tax. It applies to particular gas company profits under particular conditions.

The quirks and complications of PRRT lead to another perverse outcome – the oil and gas projects that supply Australia’s domestic market pay around $1 billion per year in PRRT, while the much bigger export projects pay next to nothing.

That $1 billion per year that the domestic projects paid is less than the government collects on HECS debts, less than beer excise, but it’s still something. Prior to 2023, the Federal Government plainly stated that “to date, not a single [gas export] project has paid any PRRT” (page 180). Some exporters thought they might never pay it.

The Albanese Government was well aware of Australia’s great gas giveaway and made changes to the PRRT in 2023. But instead of fixing the problem, they made a minor tweak to tax deductions that was “welcomed” by the gas companies.

It was this tweak that led to gas exporters paying $420 million per year in PRRT. This is new information that the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) provided to the recent Senate Select Committee on the Taxation of Gas Resources. The ATO told the Senate that gas exporters had paid $1.2 billion in PRRT between 1 July 2023 and 26 April 2026, or roughly $420 million per year (PDF page 5).

To be clear, the Australian Government is getting less money than Japan from Australian gas exports even after it “fixed” the PRRT.

There is one exception to the Australian Government’s gas giveaway – the North West Shelf project off Western Australia. It was developed in the 1970s and 1980s, with around $8 billion in WA Government subsidies to supply both WA domestic gas and gas exports.

To claw some of that taxpayer money back, the WA and Australian governments do charge for North West Shelf gas. In 2025-26, the WA Government expected $402 million from North West Shelf Grants (page 145), meaning the Australian Government would collect around $200 million. Not all of that is from exports, as North West Shelf gas is also supplied to the WA market. Even if it was all from exports, it wouldn’t see the Australian Government’s revenue from gas exports overtake Japan’s tax on Australian gas.

It’s clear that Australia is not getting a fair return for our gas resources. A 25% tax on gas exports would raise $17 billion per year and at last see Australians get more for Australian resources than the Japanese Government.

Advertisement

Related Articles

OPINION

When essential workers can't afford to live in our communities, everyone pays the price

By Kasy Chambers

There was a time when having a decent job meant you could afford a decent home. You might not have been rich, but if you worked hard, you could pay the rent, cover the bills, and have something left over. For millions of Australians, that has fallen apart.

EconomySociety & Inequality
When essential workers can't afford to live in our communities, everyone pays the price

WHAT'S NEW

Australia risks repeating New Zealand's mistakes as ACTU warns against further rate hikes

By Tegan George

The Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) has warned against further interest rate rises, with new research estimating that almost 900,000 fewer Australians would be in full-time work if the country had followed New Zealand’s economic path.

Economy
Australia risks repeating New Zealand's mistakes as ACTU warns against further rate hikes

OFF THE CHARTS

Despite what the Business Council may say, businesses really like investing in Victoria

By Greg Jericho

Every year, the Business Council of Australia (BCA) puts out its report “Regulation Rumble”. This year’s report, as with previous reports, placed Victoria as the worst place to do business. And again, as with previous reports, it received rather unquestioning media reportage.

Economy
Despite what the Business Council may say, businesses really like investing in Victoria

OPINION

Is the RBA backing the wrong horse?

By Fiona Katauskas

Economy
Is the RBA backing the wrong horse?