Skip to main content
Advanced search
The Point - home
DonateSubscribe
HomeWhat's NewOpinionOff the ChartsExplainersFactcheckAbout Us
The Point — home
DonateSubscribe
The Point — home
Advanced search
  • Home
  • What's New
  • Opinion
  • Off the Charts
  • Explainers
  • Factcheck
  • About Us
DonateSubscribe
Subscribe
  • Home
  • What's New
  • Opinion
  • Off the Charts
  • Explainers
  • Factcheck
  • About Us
The Point - home
Privacy PolicySitemapComplaints & CorrectionsNewsletter

The Point recognises the ancestral connections and custodianship of Traditional Owners throughout Australia. We pay respect to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures and to Elders past and present.

©2025–2026 The Point, an initiative of The Australia Institute

FACTCHECK

Factcheck: Is the PM being 'fair dinkum' on his answers to a gas tax? (no)

In an interview with ABC Perth, PM Anthony Albanese defended his decision not to tax gas exports, made claims about gas company tax payments and called on The Australia Institute to be 'fair dinkum'. But, is he being 'fair dinkum' too?

By Rod Campbell

Mon 18 May 2026 11.30 AEST

Economy
Not True
Factcheck: Is the PM being 'fair dinkum' on his answers to a gas tax? (no)

Photo: AAP Image/Lukas Coch

Republish this article

This article is licensed under Creative Commons — Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0).

Republishing guidelines

  • You must credit the author(s) and The Point.
  • You must link back to the original article.
  • You may not edit or modify the article content.
  • Images may be subject to separate copyright and are not included in this licence.

In an interview with ABC Perth, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese defended his decision not to tax gas exports, made claims about gas company tax payments and called on The Australia Institute to be “fair dinkum”:

Journalist: If you’ve changed your mind on [capital gains tax], why don’t you want to break your word to gas companies when it comes to introducing a 25 per cent tax on gas exports?

PRIME MINISTER: Well, this is something that’s just come from, you know, a social media campaign –

Journalist: The Australia Institute says it could raise $17 billion a year.

PRIME MINISTER: The Australia Institute have run this campaign. But they need to be fair dinkum about it as well. They need to be honest that gas companies paid $22 billion of tax last year, that they pay royalties, that they pay company tax as well as PRRT.

The Prime Minister is factually wrong on two points and misleading on two more.

Let’s have a look.

1. Does the call for a 25% tax on gas exports come from ‘a social media campaign run by The Australia Institute?’

Actually, the specific call for a 25% tax on gas export revenue comes originally from the Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU).

In August 2025, ACTU Secretary, Sally McManus, urged the Albanese Government to consider “a 25% export levy on Liquified Natural Gas replacing the broken PRRT”, building on her years of calling out “oil and gas companies that pay no tax at all.”

The Australia Institute has called for reform of gas taxation and PRRT since at least 2017 in submissions, research papers, and events as well as social media.

2. Tax on gas exports vs tax paid by gas companies

The Prime Minister takes the question on taxing gas exports and gives an answer about gas companies. The switch is subtle, but important.

Companies that sell gas to Australians, like Origin Energy and AGL, pay tax in most years. Most PRRT has been paid by companies that operate in Bass Strait, sending gas ashore in Victoria into the domestic market.

The bigger concern is the huge, export-only projects that operate in waters controlled by Prime Minister Albanese’s government. Over the last four years, multinational companies made $170 billion exporting gas they got for free from the Commonwealth, without paying royalties, PRRT or, until recently, company tax.

3. Did gas companies pay $22 billion in tax last year?

No. This is not true. The entire oil and gas sector, including exporters and non-exporters, paid $10.2 billion in company tax in 2023-24, along with $1.4 billion in PRRT, according to the Australian Taxation Office, the latest official estimate available. Most of the PRRT and a significant amount of company tax is paid by domestic-focused oil and gas companies.

The Prime Minister is not quoting official data, but a forecast made by a gas industry lobby group, based on an unreleased survey of its members.

Even then, this forecast estimates $13.5 billion in company tax, $1.3 billion in PRRT, along with $6.6 billion in royalties that are mostly paid to the Queensland Government.

These royalties are not a tax, but a payment to the Queensland Government to compensate it for using the gas that Queenslanders own. Much as builders pay for bricks, bakers pay for flour, and farmers pay for water, gas companies in Queensland pay for gas. Prime Minister Albanese’s government is unusual in that it does not charge a royalty for gas, effectively giving it away for free.

4. Wars are driving recent gas tax payments

The Prime Minister gives the impression that multi-billion dollar tax payments from the gas industry are typical. They are not.

First Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the more recent war on Iran have seen gas exporters in Australia enjoy “windfall” profits of $112 billion. That is, even though gas exporters have sold the same amount of gas each year since 2022, they have gained an additional $112 billion purely due to war-driven price spikes.

It is these huge war-profits that have seen the entire oil and gas industry go from just $623 million in company tax in 2020-21 to $12 billion two years later, according to the Australian Taxation Office. This level of tax revenue is unusual and will fall unless the wars continue indefinitely, or unless Prime Minister Albanese taxes gas exports in the way that the trade union movement has proposed and so many others have supported.

Advertisement

Related Articles

OPINION

From pilot to powerhouse: expanding WA’s sustainable bond market

By Brad Hiller & Brad Pettit

Now a staple of global finance, GSS bonds offer a powerful mechanism to fund pressing environmental and social initiatives that lie outside traditional government budgets.

Environment & BiodiversityEconomy
From pilot to powerhouse: expanding WA’s sustainable bond market

OFF THE CHARTS

If the RBA forecasts continue, real wages won’t recover to 2021 levels until 2044

By Greg Jericho

Last week, when the Reserve Bank announced it had raised the cash rate to 4.85%, it also released its latest forecasts for the economy in its Statement on Monetary Policy. For those hoping for a recovery in lost living standards, the news was very grim.

Economy
If the RBA forecasts continue, real wages won’t recover to 2021 levels until 2044

OPINION

Six ways to save the Commonwealth billions, fairly and efficiently

By Matt Grudnoff & Greg Jericho

If the government wants to pursue significant spending cuts, this piece proposes six options that help achieve short term equity and long run efficiency goals. Together, they could save between $14 billion and $62 billion.

Economy
Six ways to save the Commonwealth billions, fairly and efficiently

OPINION

Who gets to decide what a 'realistic' energy transition is?

By Ray Wills & Peter Newman

There is a difference between what Australia should do and what our most influential businesses would prefer we don’t do. Our energy debate too often blurs the two by insisting on being ‘realistic’.

ClimateEconomy
Who gets to decide what a 'realistic' energy transition is?