Skip to main content
Advanced search
The Point - home
DonateSubscribe
HomeWhat's NewOpinionOff the ChartsExplainersFactcheckAbout Us
The Point — home
DonateSubscribe
The Point — home
Advanced search
  • Home
  • What's New
  • Opinion
  • Off the Charts
  • Explainers
  • Factcheck
  • About Us
DonateSubscribe
Subscribe
  • Home
  • What's New
  • Opinion
  • Off the Charts
  • Explainers
  • Factcheck
  • About Us
The Point - home
Privacy PolicySitemapComplaints & CorrectionsNewsletter

The Point recognises the ancestral connections and custodianship of Traditional Owners throughout Australia. We pay respect to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures and to Elders past and present.

©2025–2026 The Point, an initiative of The Australia Institute

FACTCHECK

Will a third of Barnaby Joyce’s electorate be covered in renewables?

By Skye Predavec

Thu 6 Nov 2025 22.38 AEDT

Climate
Fanciful at best
Will a third of Barnaby Joyce’s electorate be covered in renewables?

Photo: AAP Image/Mick Tsikas

Republish this article

This article is licensed under Creative Commons — Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0).

Republishing guidelines

  • You must credit the author(s) and The Point.
  • You must link back to the original article.
  • You may not edit or modify the article content.
  • Images may be subject to separate copyright and are not included in this licence.

On Tuesday, Barnaby Joyce took to Sky News to complain solar and wind projects had “carpeted” his electorate.

The claim:  

“I come from a seat, Laura, where 31 per cent of the area of the New England is going to be covered in solar panels and wind turbines. I don’t think people ever comprehend that” 

If that number sounds ridiculously high, that’s because it is. New England is 75,000 square kilometres in size, so 31% of it would be bigger than Sydney and Melbourne put together. 

You would think somebody else would’ve noticed if that much land was set to be covered in renewables, but his Sky News interview seems to be the only place that 31% figure has ever appeared on the internet. 

And if you don’t trust us on this being wrong, trust Barnaby. He followed up his claim with: 

“We’ve got 400 square kilometres of solar panels coming into our electorate… then 4,000 square kilometres of wind turbines and the associated transmission lines” 

So now he claims 4,400 square kilometres will be covered by solar and wind projects, or just 5.8% of New England – less than one fifth of the first number. 

We couldn’t find a source for that either, and though it’s closer to a realistic figure, it still overstates the amount of land that renewables currently, or probably ever will, cover in New England. 

Barnaby might hate electricity that comes from the wind, but he seems fine sourcing facts from thin air. 

Verdict: Fanciful 

Related Articles

WHAT'S NEW

UN experts scrutinise Australia’s climate leadership days before COP31

By Tegan George

Australia’s global climate leadership has come under heavy scrutiny just days before COP31, with United Nations human rights experts calling for the country to match its international climate ambitions with stronger action at home.

Climate
UN experts scrutinise Australia’s climate leadership days before COP31

OPINION

The government has admitted that dodgy offsets hamper climate action

By Ketan Joshi

This is the third piece of seven in an ongoing series examining the remarkable flaws of the Safeguard Mechanism, updating our previous analyses with new data, facts and figures as a review of the scheme kicks into gear.

Climate
The government has admitted that dodgy offsets hamper climate action

OPINION

Who gets to decide what a 'realistic' energy transition is?

By Ray Wills & Peter Newman

There is a difference between what Australia should do and what our most influential businesses would prefer we don’t do. Our energy debate too often blurs the two by insisting on being ‘realistic’.

ClimateEconomy
Who gets to decide what a 'realistic' energy transition is?

WHAT'S NEW

Troubled waters: Woodside’s Scott Reef plans spark fresh fears

By Tegan George

Woodside Energy is pushing ahead with plans for underwater surveys at Scott Reef, more than two years after Western Australia’s environmental watchdog raised serious concerns about irreversible damage from its proposed Browse gas development.

Climate
Troubled waters: Woodside’s Scott Reef plans spark fresh fears