Skip to main content
Advanced search
The Point - home
DonateSubscribe
HomeWhat's NewOpinionOff the ChartsExplainersFactcheckAbout Us
The Point — home
DonateSubscribe
The Point — home
Advanced search
  • Home
  • What's New
  • Opinion
  • Off the Charts
  • Explainers
  • Factcheck
  • About Us
DonateSubscribe
Subscribe
  • Home
  • What's New
  • Opinion
  • Off the Charts
  • Explainers
  • Factcheck
  • About Us
The Point - home
Privacy PolicySitemapComplaints & CorrectionsNewsletter

The Point recognises the ancestral connections and custodianship of Traditional Owners throughout Australia. We pay respect to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures and to Elders past and present.

©2025–2026 The Point, an initiative of The Australia Institute

OPINION

The RBA has raised rates again. Here’s what its statement really means

Greg Jericho, Chief Economist at the Australia Institute, annotates the RBA’s latest statement, breaking down what the central bank is really telling us.

Greg Jericho

Greg Jericho

Tue 29 Sep 2026 15.23 AEST

Economy
The RBA has raised rates again. Here’s what its statement really means

Photo: AAP Image/Dan Himbrechts

Republish this article

This article is licensed under Creative Commons — Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0).

Republishing guidelines

  • You must credit the author(s) and The Point.
  • You must link back to the original article.
  • You may not edit or modify the article content.
  • Images may be subject to separate copyright and are not included in this licence.

Here is an annotated version of the Reserve Bank’s statement to make sure you understand what the RBA is really saying:

Statement by the Monetary Policy Board: Monetary Policy Decision

Number 2026-27

Date 29 September 2026

At its meeting today, the Board decided to increase the cash rate target by 25 basis points to 4.60 per cent.

Inflation remains elevated and some of the upside risks flagged in August are materialising. The conflict in the Middle East has broadened and global energy prices are now much higher than had been assumed in the August forecasts.

All of which is outside of our control, but please ignore that.

AI-related demand is driving rapid growth in global prices for technology-related goods. And there remains pressure on domestic capacity.

Again, interest rates going up won’t affect data centre building; all it will do is make it harder for households to borrow to build a home or for small business to operate. But, sorry, we need data centres… and the rest of you need to suffer because… well look, it’s not like there are any actual benefits of the data centres, but hey smell that investment!

Liaison indicates that firms are experiencing cost pressures and are either increasing the prices of their goods and services or looking to do so.

Yes, we know inflation in July fell from 3.8% to 3.5%, and the latest CPI, which comes out tomorrow, will be driven by petrol prices, which rose around 15% in August. The increased cost of 34 cents/litre in petrol prices since the last RBA meeting is equivalent to the cost of one rate rise, so in effect households have now had 2 rate rises. Cool, eh? But look, businesses tell us they need to raise prices or their profits might fall.

Short-term measures of inflation expectations remain elevated. And recent inflation outcomes in Australia were stronger than expected at the previous meeting.

Yes, this is because the Iran War has not finished as hoped and oil prices are now back over US$100/pbl, but surely oil buyers look at the Australian cash rate to determine oil prices?

Growth in output has slowed but, at the margin, was stronger than expected in the June quarter.

We have decided that even though growth in the first 6 months of this year was just 0.7% and as a rule, we aim for around 1.5% growth every 6 months, we would like it slower. Also, you need to realise the reality is not what matters; it is what we expected to be the reality that matters! Reality was not as bad as we expected; therefore, we need to do what we can to make reality conform to our expectation.

There are signs that growth in consumer spending is easing gradually as expected, although housing prices have fallen in most capital cities and new housing loans have declined noticeably.

Easing consumer spending, but hey, smash then again! In August, household spending was flat, and if you take away the increased spending on petrol, overall spending fell. We spent less on food, less on furniture and household stuff, less on health, less on recreation and culture. But we think you could all spend even less.

Labour market conditions have eased broadly as expected in recent months,

i.e. unemployment has risen from 4.4% to 4.6% since the RBA last met and from 4.1% since the start of the year – that’s around 87.000 more people unemployed. And you wonder why we say “eased broadly” instead?

And labour market leading indicators are broadly stable

Things should not get too much worse… we hope.

Get our newsletter

Quality research, analysis, explainers and factchecks from experts you can trust.

Meanwhile, growth in business investment and debt is strong.

There’s a lot of investment in datacentres.

There continue to be heightened uncertainties about the outlook for domestic economic activity and inflation. The Middle East conflict remains unresolved, and there are scenarios where inflation is higher and activity lower than forecast. Global oil supply disruptions are maintaining upward pressure on global and domestic energy prices and inflation. A period of prolonged uncertainty may also cause growth to be lower overseas and in Australia. To date, however, growth in Australia’s major trading partners has been stronger than expected, as the boost from AI-related investment has outweighed the adverse effects of the Middle East conflict.

A whole lot of words to say things are happening that we have no control over and which interest rates will not affect one jot.

In Australia, weak productivity growth continues to constrain potential growth and there are uncertainties about the economic effects of the downturn in the housing market.

Productivity is a poorly measured and understood item, but it is a good excuse. Rate rises don’t affect it, but it sounds like a reasonable reason. Uncertainty is usually a reason to keep rates on hold but not today.

Decision

Since the previous meeting, some of the upside risks to inflation are materialising. There have been further disruptions to global oil supply and recent data suggest that growth and inflation in Australia have been higher than expected. Higher fuel prices have partially been passed through to prices of other goods and services. This inflation impulse is in addition to the effect of capacity pressures in the economy.

We can’t do anything about what is causing inflation, but we want to look like we can. Mostly, we are worried about people thinking we don’t care about inflation anymore, so we need to look tough and that we are keeping down inflation expectations

The Board remains focused on ensuring that high inflation does not become embedded. To achieve this, growth in aggregate demand needs to remain subdued for a period to reduce capacity pressures and bring inflation back to target.

Because inflation right now is 3.5%, and not below 3.0%, we need more people to be unemployed, and if we need to go close to a recession to get inflation below 3% even if prices are rising because of oil prices, then so be it.

The three increases in the cash rate target since the beginning of the year have tightened financial conditions and the economy appears to be slowing. But inflation is still too high and the Board judged that, in light of recent developments, a further tightening in financial conditions is warranted to support a return of inflation to target in a reasonable period.

Everything is a nail when all you have is a hammer. Also, we like hammering

The Board will continue to do what it considers necessary to bring inflation sustainably back to target, including increasing the cash rate target further if needed.

We might need to make sure a few more of you are out of work.

Accordingly, the Board will be attentive to the data and the evolving assessment of the outlook and risks to guide its decisions. Monetary policy is well placed to respond to developments, and the Board is focused on its mandate to deliver price stability and full employment.

If we stuffed up, we will cut rates ASAP and hope like hell we haven’t sent the economy into a recession.

Today’s policy decision was unanimous.

When the market thinks there’s a 90% chance of a rate rise, then who are we to disagree?

Greg Jericho is Chief Economist at the Australia Institute.

Related Articles

OPINION

From pilot to powerhouse: expanding WA’s sustainable bond market

By Brad Hiller & Brad Pettit

Now a staple of global finance, GSS bonds offer a powerful mechanism to fund pressing environmental and social initiatives that lie outside traditional government budgets.

Environment & BiodiversityEconomy
From pilot to powerhouse: expanding WA’s sustainable bond market

OFF THE CHARTS

If the RBA forecasts continue, real wages won’t recover to 2021 levels until 2044

By Greg Jericho

Last week, when the Reserve Bank announced it had raised the cash rate to 4.85%, it also released its latest forecasts for the economy in its Statement on Monetary Policy. For those hoping for a recovery in lost living standards, the news was very grim.

Economy
If the RBA forecasts continue, real wages won’t recover to 2021 levels until 2044

OPINION

Six ways to save the Commonwealth billions, fairly and efficiently

By Matt Grudnoff & Greg Jericho

If the government wants to pursue significant spending cuts, this piece proposes six options that help achieve short term equity and long run efficiency goals. Together, they could save between $14 billion and $62 billion.

Economy
Six ways to save the Commonwealth billions, fairly and efficiently

OPINION

Who gets to decide what a 'realistic' energy transition is?

By Ray Wills & Peter Newman

There is a difference between what Australia should do and what our most influential businesses would prefer we don’t do. Our energy debate too often blurs the two by insisting on being ‘realistic’.

ClimateEconomy
Who gets to decide what a 'realistic' energy transition is?